This Remarkably Effective Diabetes Remedy I referred to in my previous post, is creating waves!

“Joe Public” is fed up!

An “insider” disclosed that the “Big Business of Medicine” is scamming people – and even worse: they have enlisted the help of the “law-makers!”

It would appear that “money” (as usual) has blinded doctors and medical practitioners to the degree that they are now knowingly not telling the whole truth regarding diabetes treatments – its control, management, and even its cure!

That’s right: “diabetes cure!”

And what is even more shocking:

It would appear that it’s against the law to say the word “cure” when describing anything that actually cures you. However, it is quite acceptable to say that something “treats” or helps “offset” the symptoms of some health condition or disease.

So, if you say “cure” (even when you in fact have a real and bona fide PROVEN cure for something!) you could get arrested.

Why do we have a “healthcare” industry and not a “healthcure” industry? – Simply because no one’s out to “cure” anyone because there’s not much money in curing.

Instead, keeping you sick and marginally pain-free is all anyone’s really out to do for you these days – because doing so means you being “forced” to buy the same drugs over and over again, and again, and … (you get the point!)

Of course, if a cure came along it would mean you buy it one time, and then you’re cured – and that’s that (over and done!)

But a number of doctors, and other health practitioners, armed with “real answers” and “real solutions” are speaking out and are NOT afraid of “Big Brother!”

One such person – Melford Bibens, CPT – is doing just this, as he “naturally” overcame his Diabetes! – We can’t say he found a natural cure for diabetes as this may be breaking the law!

Melford has lectured and personally helped many individuals beat the disease and after a re-diagnoses have found to “no longer having the disease at all!” (Something that the doctors, have always ruled out as a possibility altogether!)

But it’s not certain how long Melford will be allowed to do this because “The Powers That Be” have actually started using “Gestapo” tactics whereby people and businesses truly offering “cures” have been raided!

So, if you’re wise and want to find out about this effective diabetes remedy while it’s still possible for you to do so, then just CLICK HERE NOW:

Act Now for you may return to find this site completely removed – in  the name of the “Law”

Is there a natural cure for diabetes? If you search on the web there are many such claims of natural remedies or treatment for diabetes. The traditional medicine fraternity have indicated that there isn’t a cure. However, traditional medical training tends to minimize the importance of the nutritional considerations and therefore are they in a position to judge whether there is a cure or not?

Could one call a remedy, a cure? Or is it just a way of controlling the disease better.

I have come across a remarkably effective remedy that could be regarded as a cure – if one is allowed to use the word cure. At what point can one call something a cure? Does it depend on how many people it benefits?

According to Wikipeadia, a cure is “the end of a medical condition”. So if the remedy cures one person, would it be regarded as a cure or does the word remedy indicate that it helps to control the disease?

Again – referring to Wikipeadia, the word remedy can indicate a cure.

Anyway, back to this remarkable remedy for Diabetes, I will tell all in my next blog.

Gestational diabetes (also known as gestational diabetes mellitus, or GDM) only affects pregnant women. It is a form of diabetes where pregnant women exhibit high levels of blood glucose during pregnancy even though they have never been previously diagnosed with actual diabetes. This condition can affect anywhere from 3-10% of pregnant women, depending on the population.

Gestational diabetes is typically diagnosed during the 24th and 28th weeks of their pregnancy, so it is recommended the all pregnant women be screened for this condition at that time. The following factors are associated with a high chance of developing GDM include:

1. a previous diagnosis of gestational diabetes or pre diabetes
2. family history
3. the mothers age (the risk of GDM increases significantly after age 35)
4. ethnic background
5.  having a prior child with above normal body weight
6. History of smoking

Nevertheless, anywhere from 40-60% of women with GDM have no discernible risk factors at all, which is the main reason why screening for it in the 24th-28th week is so highly recommended.

In most cases, the mother’s blood glucose level returns to normal after delivery. Furthermore, the symptoms are usually mild and don’t pose a threat to the health or life of the mother. Mostly, there are no symptoms. However, when they do occur, they include nausea, vomiting, blurred vision, fatigue, increased thirst, need for urination, as well as infections of the bladder, vagina, and skin.

Gestational diabetes does pose risks to the baby and these are growth abnormalities, low blood sugar, jaundice, and chemical imbalances after birth. Infants that are born to mothers with GDM may also be either too large or too small for their gestational age. When the baby is too large, this increases the risks of complications during delivery, whether with the use of instruments or natural.  There is also some inconclusive evidence that mothers with GDM run the risk of developing preeclampsia, which is a form of hypertension associated with high levels of protein in the urine. Preeclampsia is regarded as one of the more serious complications for its potential effects on both the mother and baby.

If a mother is diagnosed with Gestational diabetes,  then the mother and the fetus should be closely monitored for the remainder of the pregnancy. The mother should be trained to monitor her own blood glucose levels to ensure that it remains within normal limits. Maintaining normal blood glucose levels during pregnancy helps to ensure the health and well-being of the fetus. Although there is a small chance that the fetus or newborn might die, careful monitoring of both fetus and mother combined with the appropriate treatments will lower the risk of this to almost nil. Mothers that had GDM will still need close monitoring after giving birth in case they develop full-blown diabetes, so that it can be caught early. Depending on the risk factors, there is a very good chance of mothers with GDM getting some form of actual diabetes within 5-10 years after delivery.